What's Wrong With This Picture?


In a country with a population of 1 billion and the average individual income less than $500 USD per year, it might seem sort of perverse to parade around a group of impoverished people holding expensive designer accessories and then photograph them for a fashion magazine layout. In fact, that is exactly what Vogue India did for their August 2008 issue.

Over half of India’s population lives on less than $2.00 per day. Yet, here in the glossy pages of this so-called “fashion” magazine, are images of a toothless old woman in traditional Indian dress holding an infant in a $100 Fendi bib, and an old man with holes in his dirty shirt holding a $200 Burberry umbrella.

The editor of Vogue India, one Ms. Priya “let-them-eat-gulab-jamin” Tanna was quoted in a New York Times interview saying, “You have to remember with fashion, you can’t take it that seriously. We weren’t trying to make a political statement or save the world.”

Ms. Tanna, I respectfully disagree. Welcome to the new world of Sustainable Fashion. This is precisely the kind of exploitation that has managed to rile so many fashionable people and launch a movement toward fair labor practices, ethical manufacturing, fair trade, and ecologically sound products.

Not to put the blame entirely on Vogue India, however; it seems that luxury brands are clamoring to get at the top 1/10 of Indian households which hold the majority of the country’s wealth. While millions of people sleep in filth with no access to running water, billboards and magazines full of Western status symbols taunt them, and at the same time, entice the Indian elite to own all the right logos.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a socialist. I don’t think everyone on earth should have the same amount of money or property or Gucci. I’m saying that, if by chance, you have been lucky enough to receive more than your fair share of this world’s luxuries, try not to humiliate and exploit the less fortunate just for the sake of “fashion”. As they say in India, that’s just bad karma.

About Amanda Quraishi

9 Comments

  1. Wow. That is intense. The last cries of a dying empire… swathing the world’s babes in designer schwag is such a stark image. The emptiness of the ‘brand’ reverberates.

  2. Amaanda, Thanks so much for this post, for bringing it to our attention and for your clear, take-no-prisoners writing. I’m glad that you’re calling Vogue on this – it’s irresponsible, flippant and just plain mean-spirited. Fashion does not have to be snarky to be “cool.”

  3. wow, Q. i’m speechless. and disgusted.

  4. It’s very sad to see something like this happen. Thought It’s good to see someone like yourself call them on it

  5. I think you tweeted about this right! Vogue Fucked up! @greenmom

  6. Well said Alline

    I am a big lover of fashion and hate how publications like this, gives it such a bad name.

    For what its worth, I soooo hope they were at least compensated. Well. But I guess its unrealistic to expect them to be paid the same as a the average models featured in that same magazine is paid.

  7. How much did they pay the “old woman”? This may change the pespective!

  8. Can’t believe they ever thought this was a good idea. What on earth were they thinking?!

  9. That is so sad. I am not a big fan of Vogue magazine anyway and this picture just makes me sick. We should be helping these people not taking pictures of them with things they can only dream of having. :(

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>