<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: 1908 Ford Model T vs. 2008 Ford Pick-Up</title> <atom:link href="http://eco-chick.com/2008/10/1467/1908-ford-model-t-vs-2008-ford-pick-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/10/1467/1908-ford-model-t-vs-2008-ford-pick-up/</link> <description>The modern girl&#039;s guide to living green &#38; fabulous.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:53:02 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: DJK</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/10/1467/1908-ford-model-t-vs-2008-ford-pick-up/comment-page-1/#comment-5731</link> <dc:creator>DJK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1467#comment-5731</guid> <description>Well, I like my tank (Ford F150).   But, I would like to see things, body parts, made of things like hemp plastic.  We need to legalize hemp farming and see where it takes us.Maybe Prop 19 in CA will help us with that goal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I like my tank (Ford F150).   But, I would like to see things, body parts, made of things like hemp plastic.  We need to legalize hemp farming and see where it takes us.</p><p>Maybe Prop 19 in CA will help us with that goal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian, Clemson</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/10/1467/1908-ford-model-t-vs-2008-ford-pick-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3186</link> <dc:creator>Brian, Clemson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:31:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1467#comment-3186</guid> <description>Lokki, Yes, but by 1928, the price for a new Model A roadster was $385, and was a substantially more capable car than the the T, with a top speed of 65 mph and having similar, or even a bit better, fuel economy than the T.  Although my 2007 Honda Fit has a lot of very practical improvements over Mom&#039;s 1928 Ford, the most substantial gains are in safety, acceleration, handling, and comfort, and maintenance requirements.   The improvement in fuel economy between these, while very real, is relatively small in comparison to other metrics.I think the big issue here is not a engineering one.  The Model A and the Fit are almost identical in size and weight, yet the A was a full size car and the Fit was sold as a subcompact.  Ironically, the Fit has much more interior space.   Americans need to learn to actually be satisfied with comfortable transport for four, and quit driving tanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lokki,<br /> Yes, but by 1928, the price for a new Model A roadster was $385, and was a substantially more capable car than the the T, with a top speed of 65 mph and having similar, or even a bit better, fuel economy than the T.  Although my 2007 Honda Fit has a lot of very practical improvements over Mom&#8217;s 1928 Ford, the most substantial gains are in safety, acceleration, handling, and comfort, and maintenance requirements.   The improvement in fuel economy between these, while very real, is relatively small in comparison to other metrics.</p><p>I think the big issue here is not a engineering one.  The Model A and the Fit are almost identical in size and weight, yet the A was a full size car and the Fit was sold as a subcompact.  Ironically, the Fit has much more interior space.   Americans need to learn to actually be satisfied with comfortable transport for four, and quit driving tanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lokki</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/10/1467/1908-ford-model-t-vs-2008-ford-pick-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3185</link> <dc:creator>Lokki</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:11:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1467#comment-3185</guid> <description>To state the obvious, your comparison isn&#039;t very well thought out. For a more realistic evaluation of the current situation, let’s compare the Model T of 1908 with the equivalent transportation for 2008. The Model T was the cheapest transportation for four passengers that was available in its day.What would be it’s equivalent today? Perhaps the Kia Rio? It that’s acceptable, let’s start the comparisons:1908 Model T MSRP when new in 1908: $825 Inflation adjusted to 2008: $18,817 MPG 13/21 Available options: N/A Top Speed 45 MPH2008 Kia RioMSRP when new in 2008: $10,890 - $14,715 Inflation adjusted to 1908: $645 (=$14,715 ) MPG (Automatic) 25/35 Features not on the Model T AM/FM Stereo Multiple air bags Automatic Transmission Air conditioning Power windows, power locks Top Speed 119 MPHEnough said, I think.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To state the obvious, your comparison isn&#8217;t very well thought out.<br /> For a more realistic evaluation of the current situation, let’s compare the Model T of 1908 with the equivalent transportation for 2008. The Model T was the cheapest transportation for four passengers that was available in its day.</p><p>What would be it’s equivalent today? Perhaps the Kia Rio? It that’s acceptable, let’s start the comparisons:</p><p>1908 Model T<br /> MSRP when new in 1908: $825<br /> Inflation adjusted to 2008: $18,817<br /> MPG 13/21<br /> Available options: N/A<br /> Top Speed 45 MPH</p><p>2008 Kia Rio</p><p>MSRP when new in 2008: $10,890 &#8211; $14,715<br /> Inflation adjusted to 1908: $645 (=$14,715 )<br /> MPG (Automatic) 25/35<br /> Features not on the Model T<br /> AM/FM Stereo<br /> Multiple air bags<br /> Automatic Transmission<br /> Air conditioning<br /> Power windows, power locks<br /> Top Speed 119 MPH</p><p>Enough said, I think.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kat</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/10/1467/1908-ford-model-t-vs-2008-ford-pick-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3184</link> <dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:31:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1467#comment-3184</guid> <description>That is pretty cool but also sad that in today&#039;s world we haven&#039;t progressed any. :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is pretty cool but also sad that in today&#8217;s world we haven&#8217;t progressed any. <img src='http://eco-chick.com/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: web design company</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/10/1467/1908-ford-model-t-vs-2008-ford-pick-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3183</link> <dc:creator>web design company</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:24:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1467#comment-3183</guid> <description>On October 1st, 2008, the Ford Model-T turned 100-years-old. Back in 1908, the year my grandmother was born, this  universal car  as Henry Ford called it, became the first mass-produced car and the symbol of low-cost reliable transportation. But more important than it s centennial, the Model T got 13-21 MPG (max speed 45 MPH), and it was the first flexible-fuel vehicle, running on gas, ethanol or both.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On October 1st, 2008, the Ford Model-T turned 100-years-old. Back in 1908, the year my grandmother was born, this  universal car  as Henry Ford called it, became the first mass-produced car and the symbol of low-cost reliable transportation. But more important than it s centennial, the Model T got 13-21 MPG (max speed 45 MPH), and it was the first flexible-fuel vehicle, running on gas, ethanol or both.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/10/1467/1908-ford-model-t-vs-2008-ford-pick-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3182</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:23:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1467#comment-3182</guid> <description>Excellent post!  This is why Ford, GM and Chrysler are struggling - a total failure to move with the times, much less to lead.  Let&#039;s bring back good old American &quot;can do&quot;.  With it, we can solve our problems.  Without it, we are condemned to the dearth of ideas, corporate welfare road to ruin.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post!  This is why Ford, GM and Chrysler are struggling &#8211; a total failure to move with the times, much less to lead.  Let&#8217;s bring back good old American &#8220;can do&#8221;.  With it, we can solve our problems.  Without it, we are condemned to the dearth of ideas, corporate welfare road to ruin.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 373/399 objects using disk: basic

Served from: eco-chick.com @ 2012-05-24 19:14:06 -->
