<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: President Obama, Your Secretary of Agriculture Choice is The Most Important of All: Here&#039;s Why</title> <atom:link href="http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/</link> <description>The modern girl&#039;s guide to living green &#38; fabulous.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:53:02 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Roger Fortin</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-3316</link> <dc:creator>Roger Fortin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:55:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3316</guid> <description>You make a lot of good points. What the farmer&#039;s need is to go back to the days when they recieved parity pricing. If the farmers don&#039;t recieve a cost of production there won&#039;t be any small farms to supply to the local communities. Parity Pricing: In any working equation, raw material production (food) prices have to reflect the cost of production plus a profit in ratio to all cost factors. To the price structure have to be added to the cost of handling in terms of transportation, processing, and capital costs so in the end the consumer price level reflects parity.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a lot of good points. What the farmer&#8217;s need is to go back to the days when they recieved parity pricing. If the farmers don&#8217;t recieve a cost of production there won&#8217;t be any small farms to supply to the local communities.<br /> Parity Pricing: In any working equation, raw material production (food) prices have to reflect the cost of production plus a profit in ratio to all cost factors. To the price structure have to be added to the cost of handling in terms of transportation, processing, and capital costs so in the end the consumer price level reflects parity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: heather</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-3302</link> <dc:creator>heather</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 06:13:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3302</guid> <description>Brad:The by-product of ethanol production is not at all an &quot;excellent cattle and hog feed.&quot; While it is true that hogs eat a varied diet, cattle in particular were NEVER meant to ingest grain as a regular diet and their bodies are not at all evolved to digest this substance.It is shown that meat and dairy from grain-fed cattle lacks the vitamins, minerals and healthy fats that make these products great for our bodies, and often make us sick. We already have an extreme and unhealthy abundance of omega-6 fats in our diet because we ingest SO much corn (from the corn oil and corn syrup found in almost every processed food and from dairy and meat from grain-fed cows).Not to mention that feeding cows grain instead of grazing them properly on grass is incredibly destructive to the health of the cattle and harmful to the environment.We need to stop feeding cows grain just as much as we need to protect organic sustainable growing methods or stop pollution from chemical residues.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad:</p><p>The by-product of ethanol production is not at all an &#8220;excellent cattle and hog feed.&#8221; While it is true that hogs eat a varied diet, cattle in particular were NEVER meant to ingest grain as a regular diet and their bodies are not at all evolved to digest this substance.</p><p>It is shown that meat and dairy from grain-fed cattle lacks the vitamins, minerals and healthy fats that make these products great for our bodies, and often make us sick. We already have an extreme and unhealthy abundance of omega-6 fats in our diet because we ingest SO much corn (from the corn oil and corn syrup found in almost every processed food and from dairy and meat from grain-fed cows).</p><p>Not to mention that feeding cows grain instead of grazing them properly on grass is incredibly destructive to the health of the cattle and harmful to the environment.</p><p>We need to stop feeding cows grain just as much as we need to protect organic sustainable growing methods or stop pollution from chemical residues.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mark</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-3315</link> <dc:creator>mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:37:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3315</guid> <description>thank you very much for your fine piece, and for all those who thoughtfully commented.  indeed, it is that important of a position--although even before becoming an ex-pat, i&#039;ve always hoped some president-elect would call upon wendell berry for the post.  cheers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you very much for your fine piece, and for all those who thoughtfully commented.  indeed, it is that important of a position&#8211;although even before becoming an ex-pat, i&#8217;ve always hoped some president-elect would call upon wendell berry for the post.  cheers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EquineAG</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-3304</link> <dc:creator>EquineAG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:26:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3304</guid> <description>You are very right about Obama needing to look to the outside for heads of AG, EPA, Energy etc.  However, appointing yet another academic is not the way to go.  In the name of greenhouse gases the EPA passed a regulation that hinders U.S. livestock farmers in the name of the Clean Water Act.  The energy department jumped on using bio-fuels instead of fossil fuels.  The department of agriculture just creates problems and a need for lobbiests.    Pollan as secretary for any one of those departments and anyone with similar experience would be detrimental.  A writer/professor with no real hands on agriculture or energy experience?  Oh boy.  The secretaries of agriculture &amp; energy should be someone who has actual experience and knowledge of how modern farms work, the issues they face and a knowledge of current legislation and tax law.  Also someone who is not going to enact regulations with biased research from the environmental lobbyists. The administrator for the EPA should become the president of the EPA followed by the EPA ceasing to exist as a government agency.  Over regulation will be the end of this country especially when it is done without overwhelming amounts of knowledge.P.S.  Bio-fuels burn faster than regular fuel which means it is more expensive and does nothing to help the environment.  Oh and methane?  People produce it too.  Probably more with the over population issue and need to keep up production levels while engineering longer lives.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are very right about Obama needing to look to the outside for heads of AG, EPA, Energy etc.  However, appointing yet another academic is not the way to go.  In the name of greenhouse gases the EPA passed a regulation that hinders U.S. livestock farmers in the name of the Clean Water Act.  The energy department jumped on using bio-fuels instead of fossil fuels.  The department of agriculture just creates problems and a need for lobbiests.    Pollan as secretary for any one of those departments and anyone with similar experience would be detrimental.  A writer/professor with no real hands on agriculture or energy experience?  Oh boy.  The secretaries of agriculture &amp; energy should be someone who has actual experience and knowledge of how modern farms work, the issues they face and a knowledge of current legislation and tax law.  Also someone who is not going to enact regulations with biased research from the environmental lobbyists. The administrator for the EPA should become the president of the EPA followed by the EPA ceasing to exist as a government agency.  Over regulation will be the end of this country especially when it is done without overwhelming amounts of knowledge.</p><p> P.S.  Bio-fuels burn faster than regular fuel which means it is more expensive and does nothing to help the environment.  Oh and methane?  People produce it too.  Probably more with the over population issue and need to keep up production levels while engineering longer lives.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: carine van Steen</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-3308</link> <dc:creator>carine van Steen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:57:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3308</guid> <description>Michael Pollan&#039;s ideas are health and hope not only for the US but for the world. With him Obama can inspire, bring relief to fear and set the sane example.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Pollan&#8217;s ideas are health and hope not only for the US but for the world. With him Obama can inspire, bring relief to fear and set the sane example.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Linda</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-3298</link> <dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:18:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3298</guid> <description>I would like to see Obama read Francis Moore Lappe&#039;s books--the one I read in college was Diet For a Small Planet.  Her endorsement of whomever you pick, Obama, would be truly great!If you are up to it, please encourage our people to base their meals around plants and downsize on animal products.  A plant-based diet emphasis can help feed our people and people around the world and cut down dramatically on methane greenhouse gases, which are more destructive than CO2.  We need to encourage people thinking of animal meat as a condiment rather than a main course. We need to think of ethical animal husbandry and encourage buying from local farms and knowing what our animals eat and knowing they are out in the open air.Did you see in the Organic Consumer Association.org website that France recently found that harmful (Melomine?) substance from China in even their Organic Chicken? It came in with the soy.  They test. Our USDA won&#039;t even allow organic farmers to test for Mad Cow Disease, even though they want to and it is a cheap test.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see Obama read Francis Moore Lappe&#8217;s books&#8211;the one I read in college was Diet For a Small Planet.  Her endorsement of whomever you pick, Obama, would be truly great!</p><p>If you are up to it, please encourage our people to base their meals around plants and downsize on animal products.  A plant-based diet emphasis can help feed our people and people around the world and cut down dramatically on methane greenhouse gases, which are more destructive than CO2.  We need to encourage people thinking of animal meat as a condiment rather than a main course. We need to think of ethical animal husbandry and encourage buying from local farms and knowing what our animals eat and knowing they are out in the open air.</p><p>Did you see in the Organic Consumer Association.org website that France recently found that harmful (Melomine?) substance from China in even their Organic Chicken? It came in with the soy.  They test. Our USDA won&#8217;t even allow organic farmers to test for Mad Cow Disease, even though they want to and it is a cheap test.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Isaac</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-3307</link> <dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3307</guid> <description>I think that John Salazar (D-CO) is the best choice. We sent a farmer to congress how about put him in the white house.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that John Salazar (D-CO) is the best choice. We sent a farmer to congress how about put him in the white house.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brad Wilson</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-3314</link> <dc:creator>Brad Wilson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:45:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3314</guid> <description>Too little has been heard on this very important topic so far.Additional Info.  Tom Vilsack wrote part of Iowa&#039;s notorious hog factory bill, House File 519.  I think he wrote the section giving nuisance lawsuit protection to hog factories.  He&#039;s a &quot;Farm Bureau&quot; (endorsed) Democrat.  He got better by the end of his time.  Probably he doesn&#039;t know federal farm issues well.  Probably he is more influencable than most, by Obama, the public.The correction for Tom Buis is good but needs qualification.  Iowa Farmers Union and NFU were excellent on corporate farming issues through 2001, except they switched sides when Iowa Senator Tom Harkin did, following Harkin.  That is they switched from opposition to the lowering and elimination of price floors (ie. Reagan, Clinton/Gingrich Contract for America) to a greened up version of 1996 Freedom to Farm (no price floors).  This holds for 2002 and 2008.Correction.  &quot;Iowa farmers ... have shifted corn from feeding the world to ethanol production.&quot;  The real history is that the U.S., by lowering and eliminating price floors, dumped our USDA &quot;program commodities&quot; (main subsidized crops) onto world markets at below costs for a quarter century.  This massive export of below cost grains did NOT feed the world, it drove their farmers (and economies) into such poverty that they couldn&#039;t even buy below cost foods.  US Farmers lost money every year, 1981-2006 (except 1996) (8 crop total, vs full costs, without subsidies, USDA-ERS, and lost with subsidies for crops/years studied).  Ethanol helped as one factor raising prices and ending dumping (fall 06-fall 08).  Long term that helps end poverty and starvation.  Ethanol was chosen for farmers as a side investment for this very reason.We need a Sec. of Ag who will restore price floors and supply management as a way to end subsidies, making corporate agribusiness pay above cost, and ending multibillion dollar below cost gains for Tyson &amp; Smithfield.  This was the New Deal (price floors, no subsidies) and economic stimulus (Steagall Amendment 1941).  Mark Ritchie, Minnesota Sec of State (formerly IATP) is best.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too little has been heard on this very important topic so far.</p><p>Additional Info.  Tom Vilsack wrote part of Iowa&#8217;s notorious hog factory bill, House File 519.  I think he wrote the section giving nuisance lawsuit protection to hog factories.  He&#8217;s a &#8220;Farm Bureau&#8221; (endorsed) Democrat.  He got better by the end of his time.  Probably he doesn&#8217;t know federal farm issues well.  Probably he is more influencable than most, by Obama, the public.</p><p>The correction for Tom Buis is good but needs qualification.  Iowa Farmers Union and NFU were excellent on corporate farming issues through 2001, except they switched sides when Iowa Senator Tom Harkin did, following Harkin.  That is they switched from opposition to the lowering and elimination of price floors (ie. Reagan, Clinton/Gingrich Contract for America) to a greened up version of 1996 Freedom to Farm (no price floors).  This holds for 2002 and 2008.</p><p>Correction.  &#8220;Iowa farmers &#8230; have shifted corn from feeding the world to ethanol production.&#8221;  The real history is that the U.S., by lowering and eliminating price floors, dumped our USDA &#8220;program commodities&#8221; (main subsidized crops) onto world markets at below costs for a quarter century.  This massive export of below cost grains did NOT feed the world, it drove their farmers (and economies) into such poverty that they couldn&#8217;t even buy below cost foods.  US Farmers lost money every year, 1981-2006 (except 1996) (8 crop total, vs full costs, without subsidies, USDA-ERS, and lost with subsidies for crops/years studied).  Ethanol helped as one factor raising prices and ending dumping (fall 06-fall 08).  Long term that helps end poverty and starvation.  Ethanol was chosen for farmers as a side investment for this very reason.</p><p>We need a Sec. of Ag who will restore price floors and supply management as a way to end subsidies, making corporate agribusiness pay above cost, and ending multibillion dollar below cost gains for Tyson &amp; Smithfield.  This was the New Deal (price floors, no subsidies) and economic stimulus (Steagall Amendment 1941).  Mark Ritchie, Minnesota Sec of State (formerly IATP) is best.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-3313</link> <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:50:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3313</guid> <description>You make some great points. Obama has a lot to live up to. The Delta Institute, an organization that helps rebuild communities through green initiatives, recently wrote up a summary of the Obama campaign&#039;s promised environmental policies here: http://www.greenexchange.com/read.php?id=25Who he chooses in his cabinet will ultimately decide which of these promises come to fruition and which get left behind.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some great points. Obama has a lot to live up to. The Delta Institute, an organization that helps rebuild communities through green initiatives, recently wrote up a summary of the Obama campaign&#8217;s promised environmental policies here:<br /> <a href="http://www.greenexchange.com/read.php?id=25" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenexchange.com/read.php?id=25</a></p><p>Who he chooses in his cabinet will ultimately decide which of these promises come to fruition and which get left behind.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: KVB</title><link>http://eco-chick.com/2008/11/1674/an-open-letter-to-president-elect-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link> <dc:creator>KVB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:20:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eco-chick.com/?p=1674#comment-3292</guid> <description>Dear Writer:  You have great points!  I agree with your thoughts on agriculture in our country.  I do believe however that you are greatly mistaken about one of your &quot;shortlists&quot; pointed out in your blog.  Being from a small populated state whose number one economy is agriculture, I too am very interested in who President Elect Obama chooses (I was an avid supporter of him all along).I grew up on a small family farm in North Dakota.  We have no hired hands, just my mother, my father, and my siblings before we moved to college.  I would like you to take a closer look at the President of National Farmers Union, Tom Buis.  You are correct that the NFU is a lobbyist organization, but where you are mistaken is in your labels of them as supporters of industrial agriculture and corporate farming.I have been a member of the North Dakota Farmers Union my whole life, and recently worked in D.C. for the National Farmers Union.  I urge you to check out their website. www.nfu.org.  Please click on &quot;About NFU&quot; and then &quot;Policy.&quot;  This is a book written by the thousands of family farmers across the United States that NFU represents.  Notice on the bottom left hand side of the main page is a feature called &quot;BUY FROM A FAMILY FARM.&quot;  This is where members (who are all family farmers) can list their farm products online to sell to a national community.Farmers Union is an avid supporter of farm grown fuels to decrease our dependence on foreign oil, they have lobbied time and time again for decreased use of corporate farming and in the inhumane treatment of animals, and boast a sense of pride in their members ideals of being stewards of the land in conservation.Its easy to think that lobbyists in D.C. are radicals, but I guess everyone is a radical depending on where you stand on an issue.  I just wanted to direct you to some information about them before you make a judgment, I know that you will find striking similarities in their policies and how you feel about agriculture in our country.Sincerely yours, KVB</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Writer:  You have great points!  I agree with your thoughts on agriculture in our country.  I do believe however that you are greatly mistaken about one of your &#8220;shortlists&#8221; pointed out in your blog.  Being from a small populated state whose number one economy is agriculture, I too am very interested in who President Elect Obama chooses (I was an avid supporter of him all along).</p><p>I grew up on a small family farm in North Dakota.  We have no hired hands, just my mother, my father, and my siblings before we moved to college.  I would like you to take a closer look at the President of National Farmers Union, Tom Buis.  You are correct that the NFU is a lobbyist organization, but where you are mistaken is in your labels of them as supporters of industrial agriculture and corporate farming.</p><p>I have been a member of the North Dakota Farmers Union my whole life, and recently worked in D.C. for the National Farmers Union.  I urge you to check out their website. <a href="http://www.nfu.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.nfu.org</a>.  Please click on &#8220;About NFU&#8221; and then &#8220;Policy.&#8221;  This is a book written by the thousands of family farmers across the United States that NFU represents.  Notice on the bottom left hand side of the main page is a feature called &#8220;BUY FROM A FAMILY FARM.&#8221;  This is where members (who are all family farmers) can list their farm products online to sell to a national community.</p><p>Farmers Union is an avid supporter of farm grown fuels to decrease our dependence on foreign oil, they have lobbied time and time again for decreased use of corporate farming and in the inhumane treatment of animals, and boast a sense of pride in their members ideals of being stewards of the land in conservation.</p><p>Its easy to think that lobbyists in D.C. are radicals, but I guess everyone is a radical depending on where you stand on an issue.  I just wanted to direct you to some information about them before you make a judgment, I know that you will find striking similarities in their policies and how you feel about agriculture in our country.</p><p>Sincerely yours,<br /> KVB</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 429/455 objects using disk: basic

Served from: eco-chick.com @ 2012-05-25 02:24:29 -->
