The original SHAMEFUL ad that was showing during the spring and early summer. Really.
Anyone with even a modicum of concern about what they eat (or what their family eats) has cut out high fructose corn syrup.
WHY is HFCS so bad for us? Mainly, because it’s processed, and processed foods are what are making us fat, by sneaking ingredients into our bodies that our bodies never evolved to digest. Michael Pollan has recommended eating foods with no more than a handful of ingredients and avoiding any ingredients our grandparents wouldn’t recognize; HFCS has never existed before human beings manufactured it for cheap sweetener. And it’s really cheap, meaning companies can easily add it to thousands of products that never even had sugar or sweetener in them to begin with (like potato chips)! In addition:
-High Fructose Corn Syrup is typically made from genetically-modified corn.
-HFCS has been linked to higher levels of kidney damage according to this study and to fatty liver disease in this study.
-Some HFCS has also been found to contain detectable levels of mercury (17 out of 55 products containing HFCS tested high on the charts for mercury). There are NO safe levels of mercury for women of childbearing age or children.
-It’s bad for our environment. “Most corn is grown as a monoculture, meaning that the land is used solely for corn, not rotated among crops. This maximizes yields, but at a price: It depletes soil nutrients, requiring more pesticides and fertilizer while weakening topsoil.”
-It is suggested that diabetics avoid it because they body doesn’t process it like sugar (glucose) which can wreak havoc on blood sugar levels.
-HFCS makes us fat. Long story short is that fructose, the sugar in HFCS, doesn’t stimulate leptin, a hormone which tells your body it’s full. So you’ve consumed a bunch of processed sugar-like calories, but your body doesn’t get the message, leading you to eat more calories. Fructose is also “an unregulated source of “acetyl CoA,” or the starting material for fatty acid synthesis. This, coupled with unstimulated leptin levels, is like opening the flood gates of fat deposition.”
But instead of responding appropriately to a cause of ill health and obesity, the corn industry has decided to try to justify it! You are on the WRONG side of history, folks. The people that are pushing HFCS as OK are in the same book as those folks who fought smoking bans for all those years. Shameful.
If you hear of scientific reports that say that HFCS is ok, check who’s behind that research (as the Mayo Clinic points out here). The food industry is rife with ‘reports’ put out by food manufacturers themselves, and as we saw with the tobacco industry reports saying smoking is ‘ok in moderation’ (the same claim HFCS folks are making here) I trust that data as far as I can throw it.
And while the evidence about HFCS and how unhealthy it is continues to mount, some comedians have taken the situation into their own hands. This is an hilarious parody of the Corn Refiner’s ad above.
And the HILARIOUS rebuttals. Gotta love a great satire. The second and third are priceless!

















Peer pressure for adults!
08/13/09 » 11:05 am »
Hilarious High Fructose Corn Syrup Ad Parody
[...] Eco Chick: -High Fructose Corn Syrup is typically made from genetically-modified [...]
08/17/09 » 4:48 am »
Great article. It all started back in the 70′s when Nixon wanted to reduce the cost of food. That is when this country experienced a dramatic increase in heart disease, diabetes ext. Now in 2010, we consume 3 times the amount we did back then, sugar on top sugar on top of sugar, mostly from beverages.
01/28/10 » 9:33 pm »
This article is a joke. I’m no fan of fructose but don’t take me as an idiot. All is unnatural corn it modified by the Aztecs. From kenelers to the tasles. Second everyone rotates their crops because it prevents diseases. Which raises profit. Do your research.
04/19/10 » 10:30 am »
Really? The Aztecs had the technology to alter DNA? There is a difference between GMO and using cross-pollination to create new variations naturally.
Research? Like the reference linked to in the article? or maybe like this?:
http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and.....onoculture
Monoculture
The United States grows all of its major commodity crops—corn, wheat, soybeans, and cotton—in monoculture. Sometimes crops in monoculture are rotated: corn often alternates with soybeans in a two-year rotation. Much corn, however, is grown in continuous cultivation—year after year in the same field.
Although they vary from year to year, the acreages devoted to single crops in the United States are enormous. U.S. farmers plant on the order of 50-70 million acres each of corn, soybeans, and wheat each year. But because so few crops are grown in such large acreages, the opportunities for crop rotation are also few.
10/20/10 » 10:22 am »
Interesting information but I’ll trust The Mayo Clinics position over a bloggers and they say the adverse effects are inconclusive at best. Really not much different than regular sugar. Research is ongoing but as of now NO accurate conclusions can be drawn.
03/15/11 » 8:48 pm »
Its sad how blind people are to what’s happening on our planet. HFCS is mostly GMO. The Mayo Clinic probably pays off the FDA like the big corps do. Cancer/diabetics are on the rise and food is the culprit. Wake up fellow humans. Don’t allow our food to be poisoned. We need to go back to basics. I’m sorry you’ll have to abandon your twinkies and processed foods and have a salad with a side of rice and beans. Illness can be cured with vegetables.
12/27/11 » 8:28 pm »