Kids · Eco-Chick

Browsing all posts tagged with kids

Nature Kids, Hot Water Woes, and Pellet Stoves

I want my child to connect with nature, but how can a suburban park be designed to both protect visitors from Lyme disease–carrying ticks and restore the natural ecosystem?
—Lena Crandall, Scarsdale, NY

The funny thing about wildlife (even the kind that finds its way into parks and playgrounds in developed areas) is that it’s wild and therefore not completely controllable. In order to eliminate Lyme disease–carrying ticks, you would have to ban all warm-blooded animals and pave over the greenery. Still, you wouldn’t be creating an optimal environment for children. “In a matter of a few decades kids’ interactions with nature have been reduced significantly compared with all of human history,” says Richard Louv, author of Last Child in the Woods. “A new body of evidence suggests getting kids out-
side, which engages all the senses, leads to a longer attention span, increases in cognitive development, and [reduces] stress.”

So unless you want your child to grow up playing in a parking lot, the best way to avoid deer ticks is prevention. “You can’t really prevent ticks from being in outdoor areas, but you can be proactive about your own actions,” says Beth Herr, pro-
gram director at New York’s Westchester County Parks Department. (New York had more cases of Lyme disease in 2006 than any other state.) “Be sure that you tuck your pants into your socks, wear light-colored clothing, and check yourself and your child for ticks right after using outdoor facilities.”
Back to Top

I’m considering buying a tankless water heater. With all their great energy-saving features, why haven’t these systems caught on?
—Louis Weiss, Berkeley, CA

Whoever invented the storage water heaters most of us have in our homes today must have been thinking of how best to waste energy instead of save it. Think about it: Conventional systems keep water warmed to skin-scrubbing temps 24/7 even though hot water is needed for only an hour or two a day. Tankless (or demand) types do just the opposite: Water is heated instantly when you turn on the shower. Since roughly 13 percent of a home’s energy is used for this purpose, making the switch to a tankless kind could save an average of about $180 a year, and also help reduce your family’s carbon footprint.

If you choose a natural gas–burning model, it will use about 30 percent less energy than an electric one, and you can up the efficiency even more by picking a unit with an intermittent ignition rather than a constantly burning pilot light. (Two companies that sell such models are Bosch and Takagi.)

You will also save water. “You don’t need to run the shower waiting for the hot water, which wastes an average of five gallons every time you do it,” says Claudia Chandler, assis-
tant executive director for the California Energy Commission.

So why haven’t these caught on? Tankless heaters supply two to five gallons of water a minute, which might not be enough when you want to take a shower and run the dishwasher at the same time. A simple solution is to just add another unit. You will never run out of water completely, as with other heaters. While a tankless unit might be more expensive up front, you will save so much on your electricity bill it could pay for itself in as little as two years. You might also enjoy a windfall come April 15. The federal government and many states (see Energy Star and DSIRE) now offer rebates and tax deductions for energy-efficient appliances, including a $300 credit for certain tankless water heaters installed between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2007.
Back to Top

I might start heating my home with wood pellets. Is this a sustainable resource?
—Jon Bradford, Lancaster, PA

What could be cozier than the smell of wood smoke drifting over a snowy landscape? Until the early 1900s, 90 percent of Americans heated their homes with wooden logs, which are a renewable resource, since trees can be planted to replace those cut for fuel. When fossil fuels became cheaper and more widely available, many people switched from the messy fires that needed constant stoking to furnaces that burned oil or natural gas (which are both finite, nonrenewable fuels).

Concerns about global warming, rising fuel prices, and ground-level air pollution have led some homeowners to rethink how they heat their homes, and wood is slowly making a comeback. Unfortunately, traditional wood stoves and fireplaces contribute to local air pollution, since they produce particulates (few older stoves have an air smoke filter), and they can be high maintenance to keep going. Stoves that run on pellets instead of logs are cleaner and require less upkeep (picture a bag of half-inch-long pellets instead of logs).

The fuel for these stoves is also sustainable, as most pellets are made of compacted sawdust, waste paper, and bark, all by-products of the paper, agriculture, or lumber industries. Sawdust wood pellets produce the least amount of ash. Some stoves can also burn other biofuels, including soybeans, corn kernels, nutshells, barley, and cherry pits, that might otherwise end up in landfills. But make sure your stove can handle alternative fuels before trying them.

You might also have an energy auditor or certified provider come check out your house to see what size stove you need based on the area you want to heat and how well it is insu-
lated. Most pellet stoves do need to be plugged in to run their fans and controls; you can expect to use about $9 worth of electricity per month. Setup for a pellet stove is faster than for a wood stove, and about half the price. Although a pellet stove costs considerably more than a wood stove ($1,700 to $3,000 compared with $400 to $700), the pellet stove could pay for itself in as little as four years.

From my column “Green Guru” at Audubon Magazine.

agriculture, alternative fuel, Animals, cape, car, carbon, carbon footprint, cars, children, clothing, corn, design, eating, Eco-Chick, electric, electricity, Energy, epa, fall, filter, fur, gas, Global Warming, Home, kids, local, magazine, model, models, oil, paper, playgrounds, Pollution, produce, reduce, skin, soy, spa, sustainable, Tea, trees, urban, waste, water, Wildlife, wood

Living Modestly Is Not Uncomfortable

4 Comments

by Katie Kish · 01/27/08

I hate that living modestly is starting to be equated with disregarding the comforts that we’ve been given… instead of a noble and earth saving way of life.

I have a group of friends who all live together. In a maximum 6 person house (4 “real” bedrooms) there are 13 people. They have no television, only a couple of them have a computer, when I go over there are rarely lights on and they in no way went out of their way to buy new furniture or anything for the house. On top of these smaller things they also bike around – no one owns a car – cook together with vegan, organic, dumpster dived food and they run the house on grey water.

Just a quick summary for those who don’t know – dumpster diving is when you take food out of a dumpster to eat it. A lot of people get a little grossed out by this thought however having worked in a grocery store I assure you there is more than plenty of completely fresh and fine food being thrown out. Before knowing people who dumpstered I often thought “why would those dumpsters be locked???” but now I know that for whatever reason some grocery stores don’t want people stealing their garbage.

Grey water is essentially just reusing water. Most houses that are being built in Guelph are already implementing grey water systems directly into the house by connecting washing machine water to toilets. Said friends put the plug in during a shower and use shower water to flush toilets. And to be honest – the toilets don’t get flushed that often anyway.

For me, this would be an almost impossible way of living. I hate being cold, they never have the heater one. I live on my computer, they don’t have internet. I drink a liter of milk a day, they never drink milk. I will never will with a roommate ever again in my entire life unless I’m getting married, they live with 12 other people. It takes a lot of dedication and passion for the environmental movement to live this kind of lifestyle.

When I told my brother and a friend of mine about this they had the same reaction “that’s disgusting”. … I said that you would just have to get used it, but then they corrected me. Neither meant that it was physically disgusting, but that it was disgusting to see people choosing to live like “the poor”. They felt as though this was a mockery to people who couldn’t afford food, who couldn’t afford to live with just one family in a house and who couldn’t afford to keep their hydro on. Instead you have a household of by no means rich, but by no mean poor… group of kids who are choosing to not work and live like that. They choose to eat “garbage”, to be cold and to stay in the dark.

I brushed it off at the time, but it is now one thing that has been running through my head day in and day out. The only reason grocery stores throw out “almost” expired food is because if they lower the price people won’t buy the higher priced food – so they just keep it until it doesn’t make sense to sell it at the same price point and then toss out the perfectly good food.

Granted, dumpstering started out as a way to beat economic struggling but soon became a haven for “freeganism” (those who want to escape the consumerist life and culture) so it is backpacking off something poor people WERE doing. But with grey water… 50 – 80% of all residential water waste is from grey water.

cape, car, carbon, carbon footprint, dumpster diving, Food, fur, Furniture, garbage, kids, Lush, Milk, oil, Organic, style, Tea, vegan, waste, water

Quality, Not Quantity: Organic and Natural Toys

5 Comments

by Kimberly Jordan Allen · 01/24/08

When we first started to register for baby gifts we knew that we wanted to avoid being inundated with primary colored hunks of plastic that scream encouraging jargon (“great job!!” said the machine…) whilst playing a neon light show that could stimulate anyone into a state of ADD. Now that my kids are playing more and starting to cruise around, I have been looking into more wholesome toys they can interact with; nibble, drag, pummel, hug and so on. There are a few toy sites that have good, quality toys. With today’s toxin scares, purchasing well-made, non-toxic toys takes a bit of research but is worth the effort. Here are a few toys and sites that we love. Sometimes it costs a bit more to buy something sustainably produced, but to us it is better to have a few good toys than hundreds of pieces of landfill fodder. Not all toys on these websites are organic or ‘natural,’ (depending on what that means for you) so, as with all things, read the fine print. There are a few sites that have mostly organic and natural items, such as Tiny Bird (see below.)
This dragon from Lana Organic is colorful and well-made.
Under the Nile makes quality toys and clothing that seems to last forever, surviving many washings. These stuffed grapes have been in our house since the babes were born and they still play with them. Under the Nile also makes fantastic organic swaddling blankets that really make the best baby burrito!
Tiny Birds Organics carries lots of environmentally conscious toys. Plan Toys, the company that makes this rolling snail, has won many awards for their eco-friendly toys that stimulate imaginations and promote development.
This organic ball, made by Sigikid looks soft and inviting. All of their products are made using traditional Bavarian craftsmanship and are machine washable.
Uncle Goose blocks use naturally derived inks and sustainable wood. These blocks are well made and have so much to look at: pictures, numbers, letters. We love them.

awards, Baby, birds, car, clothing, cotton, Crafts, farm, Home, kids, Organic, pictures, plastic, produce, rape, sustainable, sustainable wood, wood

The Kids Are Not Going to Be Alright: They're Going to Be Pissed

9 Comments

by Starre Vartan · 12/20/07

Several of my friends have had babies in the last few years, and some are on their second round already. Though it seems to me that there are far too many people on the planet already, it’s difficult to begrudge anyone the basic human drive to reproduce, and my friends’ kids ARE ridiculously cute. I’m pretty sure they are all genius artists who will invent the next version of rock ‘n roll and create world peace, too. But every time I play with them, surrounded as they typically are by plastic toys, educational videos and the other detritus of modern children’s lives, I look into their eyes and I know: in 20 years, they are going to hate us.

Of course all teenagers and college students hate their parents a little bit (or a lot, depending on the hormones), as it’s part of forging one’s own identity. Isn’t it the American way to hold your parents in contempt until you’re at least 25, and then become them?

But these kids are going to have good reason for their anger, and I predict a revolution when these tiny tots grow to understand the legacy their parents have left them. They will inherit a planet-wide environmental mess, and it might not be impossible to fix, but it’s going to take the best minds of their age (plus their offspring), lots of money, and a singular desperation to fix what’s wrong before it’s too late. What these kids face in the coming years will make the mistakes my generation has been left with: Rockefeller drug laws, repeated pointless wars in the Middle East, and lack of marriage rights for homosexuals, seem like quaint oopsies in comparison. They’ll be figuring out how to handle the planet-altering effects of massive droughts (hey, it’s already happening) and global warming has barely gotten underway), disintegration of ecological webs as species disappear during the current mass extinction, and human migration due to the effects of global warming, not to mention changes we can’t even foresee yet.

Well, you say, each generation has to pick up after the one prior to it in one way or another; what gives those kids in diapers more permission than anyone else to let us have it? The answer is that we know what we’re doing to the environment and we still continue to do it.

adults, atmosphere, babies, children, Energy, fall, Global Warming, health, junk, kids, mainstream, media, movies, New York Times, News, NYTimes, plastic, produce, recycle, resources, spring, style, sustainable, Target, Tea, video, Vote, waste

EVO's Big-Tent Green Shopping Revolution

5 Comments

by Starre Vartan · 12/13/07

Last week, EVO, the get-everything-green-in-one-place site launched, and it’s pretty awesome. They have a ‘Green Rating System’ for each one of their products that works like this:

Simply put, how green a product is depends on what it’s made from, how it’s produced, the distance it travels to reach the consumer, and what type of energy is used to power it. EVO has created a simple rating system to help you see the “Green Attributes” of every item listed on the site. Next to each product you’ll see 1 to 5 leaves. The more green leaves a given product has, the greener it is. EVO only features products that have a minimum of one Green Attribute.

I got a chance to do an interview with Dan Siegel, one of the founders of the company, here’s the low-down:

Me: Why a Green Shopping Mall?
Dan: My partner and I put our heads together, thinking, there’s got to be a simple way for busy people to find the Earth-friendly products they are looking for online. We took the conventional wisdom from Shopzilla and Amazon but looked at it for green, and thought, what can we build that will enable green shoppers to find what they need?

Me: And how did you find all the stuff that’s on the site? It says on the homepage over 100,000 products have been rated? Did you appropriate a bunch of elves from Santa’s workshop to go through all that stuff or what?

Dan: the first piece of the site we built was a way to leverage technology to scour the web. We got it two ways: data feeds through partners, like Target and Nordstrom, with whom we’ve created relationships. The other piece is we’ve built a crawler that can go onto the pages of smaller green sellers and can pull in product data from these sites. Then we put it through our filter.

We see green attributes and match them with other attributes. We look at everything, from labels like all-natural, to biodgradable, to chemical free, Fair Trade, LEED certified, and more. It’s a massive database of attributes. And then there’s three tiers to determine the greenness. The first is the technology, which I’ve mentioned, the second is people, who work for us and check products, and the third is the community, inviting , everyone out there to look for themselves to give recommendations and experiences of products.

Me: So how’re you going to keep it honest? What’s going to prevent a company from ‘greenwashing’ their info about a product and putting up lots of nice comments about themselves to fool your system? Shockingly (hah, hah) stuff like that has been known to happen online.

Dan: There’s fraud detection built in. So if a product was made in China, which might give it a negative point, but then let’s say a company resubmits their data without that information, they’ll actually get a worse score for not including that data. That’s just one of several ways we’ll keep people from gaming the system.

Me: What’s your end goal with this project?

Dan: Our goal is that anytime anyone shops they would find what the green rating is on that product. The traditional way economists understand consumer behavior is that we all look at three important things: price, quality and convenience. The Internet has taken convenience out of the equation, so what we’re attempting to do is offer an another rating consideration when you buy something. We want to encourage people to buy stuff that has highest green rating. Green should be the new attribute for shopping decisions.

Me: What was it that made you personally want to get involved in starting EVO? Are you an old-school Treehugger or a latter-day, post-Inconvenient Truth Greenie?

Dan: I’ve always been interested in entrepreneurship but also interested in leveraging business for social change. There are these massive and aggregated markets, that are growing and mainstream. I had a personal frustration, as an outdoors person with two kids, I was always looking for green stuff online and it was hard to find. I figured someone with less passion and interest might just give up or not even bother looking for it.

Me: So where’s the cash coming from for this site? Is there some big-box store or mega-corp behind all this?

Dan: EVO is personally funded, and there’s no advertising. I’ve put a lot of my own money, and the last three years of my time into building this thing. And it’s all funded through friends and family. That’s why we’re really hoping to get the word out and get people to join the community. For everyone who joins, we’ll plant a tree!

Me: Sounds like a great place to do holiday shopping. I know I have barely started mine. Anything else you want Eco Chick readers to know about?

Dan: I really want people to feel comfortable on the site. And we are looking for information and submissions of new products, so send them over to us! You can email me directly with suggestions and ideas at dan (at) evo (dot) com.