Global Warming Debate in Supreme Court
When I first read that the Supreme Court is debating global warming and whether the U.S. Government should have more stringent emissions regulations on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from automobiles, my heart skipped a beat. The Supreme Court is going to decide whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should treat CO2 emissions as a pollution regulated under federal law, specifically under the Clean Air Act. That must mean that this is really important, but why?
After marinating in the notion of the highest court of our country discussing such a seriously contended issue as global warming, I began to understand my internal reaction.
This decision could, in essence, dictate how the United States treats global warming.
I hope we will see some interesting debate this fall. So why is the fact that the Supreme Court deliberating about global warming this fall important? This decision may be held as a final say on the subject of global warming/climate change and how our government should proceed with policy and regulation. This could go one of two ways. One is obvious – continue on the current path of trade and economics before environment. But, if it is determined that CO2 is damaging the air enough to regulate it, we may see regulation beyond automobiles to other forms of transportation (airplanes are a big contributor) or to stationary emitters (factories). That would be super responsible of us. It may even set a global trend (as some of our environmental law certainly has in the past). It could be a move toward responsible globalization.
It’s about time the feds step up to the plate on this matter, but I pray that their approach is a cautious one.